Claim Denial Management In Healthcare – What Exactly Is It?     

Category : Business
claim denial management in healthcare

Claim denials consume precious time, cost you revenue, and impact the patient experience. With the right claim denial management solutions, you can overcome this disturbing hurdle.

What Exactly Is Claim Denial management?

Claim denials are a regular source of frustration for healthcare revenue cycle staff. Which claims are endorsed and which are denied? Rejection management is the process by which businesses evaluate each denial, determine why it was refused, and determine how to address the problem, including lowering the risk of future denials. Sophisticated and robust automation, accomplished using artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) and customized to match the demands of providers, enables companies to attain broad process improvement that lowers denials on the first pass and better resolves them when they occur.

Denied claims in healthcare frequently result in increased complexity, delayed payment timeframes, and additional work for employees, in addition to the final result of diminished profitability and revenue loss. High claim denial rates, unfortunately, are a real and severe concern for many hospitals and health systems.

To promote claim denial management in healthcare, providers employ a range of tactics, with the ultimate goal of attaining reduced rates and more efficient operations. Choosing the correct denial management system directly contributes to this aim, but there are several solutions on the market. Because there are so many potential explanations for a denied claim, standard methods and procedures for managing them frequently fall short.

Denials can occur at any point during the claim denial management process. Let’s take a look at some of the most prevalent areas where rejections occur and how providers might best handle them.

Claim Denials Due To Eligibility

On the surface, eligibility appears to be a straightforward concept: either a patient is qualified for treatment or they are not.

Changes in a patient’s insurance status, payer updates on the services, drugs, and equipment that certain plans cover, and other variables can all result in a medical billing refusal.

As a result, eligibility becomes a primary worry for providers, a need that must be addressed in order to enhance claims administration.

It is insufficient to rely on personnel or an outsourced supplier that uses human procedures to gather and submit the critical information that determines eligibility. The workflow is time-consuming and fraught with the possibility of human mistakes.

A dedicated machine learning system for revenue cycle management, including denials, should be capable of capturing necessary information and determining eligibility immediately by scanning an insurance card. This method of establishing eligibility reduces mistakes from occurring early on and solves a major contributor to refused claims.

Claim Denials Due To Pre-Authorization

Standards, norms, and processes for pre-authorization are far from static.

An update on the payer’s side on which procedures, drugs, equipment, or other services require prior authorization might swiftly lead to higher denials if the provider does not make a matching adjustment. New codes, paperwork, or claim submission systems may all be disruptive.

Systems that are unable to adapt to changing needs force providers to adopt time-consuming denial management techniques, exposing them to increasing unpredictability.

In order to meet important demands connected to prior permission, providers may turn to consultants, expanded personnel counts, robotic process automation (RPA), and similar bolt-on items. As part of the pre-authorization process, these responsibilities include updating patient data and validating medical insurance, as well as disputing associated refused claims.

These techniques frequently need ongoing investment, maintenance, and management. Brittle processes that can’t adapt to regular changes in pre-authorization procedures, in the case of RPA and comparable systems, can severely restrict efficacy and increase medical claim denials.

Claim Denials Due To Incomplete Or Incorrect Information

Capturing accurate and comprehensive information is critical for efficient claims processing and minimizing rejections. Before a provider may expect to get payment from a payer, every detail must be correct.

Although correcting a rejected claim after the fact may result in fewer denials, this technique throws additional obligations on employees. Other popular denial management services may need a larger investment in a consultant, service provider, or add-on digital technology. A system that ensures all relevant information is obtained and exchanged when submitting a claim results in a more efficient procedure. Providers can better avoid rejections in the first place and address them more effectively when they do arise.

A solid automation platform that incorporates AI and ML is more than capable of meeting this need, ensuring that everything from pertinent codes to patient and provider information is incorporated. Furthermore, with the assistance of revenue cycle professionals, the system may learn how to handle unusual and unique cases over time.

Modifications, Bundled Services, And Other Claim Denials

Claim denials can result from a service that has previously been packaged with another billable service, wrongly applied modifiers, failure to provide the required documentation with a modification, and other issues.

There are so many possible complications that might develop from a certain mix of services, modifiers, and other factors that even experienced professionals may find it difficult to keep track of every necessity, exception, and detail.

Top medical billing companies have robust automated systems which are a potent option for human-led workflows and more constrained technology that is incapable of adapting to new rules, forms, and procedures over time.

The human-in-the-loop – revenue cycle professionals who support the solution’s ongoing development — gave targeted assistance when needed, while the solution handled the vast bulk of the task.

Leave a comment